Shared shortlist
One list, filtered by whoever needs it
Filter by category, letter count, or extension and hand the same view to a colleague. No exported spreadsheets, no version drift between two people reviewing the same candidates.
Brand and product teams rarely settle a name in one sitting. The catalog gives everyone the same facts to review: category, letter count, extension, pronunciation, and how the string reads in an email address or on an invoice footer.
Naming decisions rarely sit with one person. These are the parts of the catalog that keep a brand lead, a product manager, and a legal reviewer looking at the same facts instead of trading screenshots in a thread.
Shared shortlist
Filter by category, letter count, or extension and hand the same view to a colleague. No exported spreadsheets, no version drift between two people reviewing the same candidates.
Readability notes
Every entry carries a plain note on pronunciation and spelling risk, plus how the name sits in an email address or an invoice footer. Reviewers argue about the same evidence, not about memory.
Side-by-side comparison
Place short brandables and keyword-rich names in the same row and compare length, tone, and join risk. Useful when marketing wants warmth and legal wants something that survives a dictation test.
Role-based review
One person screens for tone, another checks the string against existing marks, a third reads it aloud on a call. The catalog keeps those passes separate so feedback stays specific instead of turning into a general opinion.
Availability and transfer
Enquiries are handled from South Africa. Availability checks, offer submission, and registrar transfer follow a defined order, so a team knows what happens after the shortlist narrows to one.
Typographic listing
Domain strings are set in monospace so character counts and joins are visible at a glance. Annotations stay small and factual, which keeps a long review session readable on a laptop screen.
Working through a shortlist with a wider group? The services overview explains how portfolio structure and acquisition steps fit together, and contact is the place to send a serious enquiry on any name.
A few definitions keep internal reviews honest. These notes apply to every listing in the catalog and to how a team reads a name together, not to any single entry.
A name shown in the catalog is a candidate under review, not a reserved asset. Availability is confirmed per enquiry, and a listing can be withdrawn if another buyer completes a transfer first.
The note on each entry describes how the string is spoken aloud and where a listener is likely to hesitate. It is a working observation, not a guarantee that every colleague will spell it the same way on the first try.
Readability comments cover lowercase rendering in an email address and on a printed invoice footer. They do not cover logo design, trademark clearance, or any jurisdiction-specific registration requirement.
Grouping candidates by category, letter count, and extension is a comparison aid for a team. It does not rank names, and two reviewers can reasonably reach different conclusions from the same set of facts.
Once an offer is accepted, the transfer runs through the registrar. Timelines depend on the registrar and on the current registration status, so no fixed completion date is promised at the enquiry stage.
Enquiries are handled from South Africa. Correspondence, availability checks, and offer submission follow the same sequence for every team, regardless of where the reviewers are based.